Federal marijuana prohibition act

Several defendants among them: Rodriguez, Rafael Camacho-Reyes, and Leonardo Tapia have served three years in prison awaiting trial, and a seventh, Brian Picard, is out on bail. Schweder reportedly operated a bed hospice for veterans in Sherman Oaks. Read more about the testimony regarding marijuana's Schedule I status.

Federal marijuana prohibition act

Schedule I is the only category of controlled substances not allowed to be prescribed by a physician.

Federal marijuana prohibition act

The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse. The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.

His letter to Harley O. StaggersChairman of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerceindicates that the classification was intended to be provisional: In a prior communication, comments requested by your committee on the scientific aspects of the drug classification scheme incorporated in H.

This communication is concerned with the proposed classification of marijuana. It is presently classed in schedule I C along with its active constituents, the tetrahydrocannibinols and other psychotropic drugs.

Some question has been raised whether the use of the plant itself produces "severe psychological or physical dependence" as required by a schedule I or even schedule II criterion.

Since there is still a considerable void in our knowledge of the plant and effects of the active drug contained in it, our recommendation is that marijuana be retained within schedule I at least until the completion of certain studies now underway to resolve the issue. The Nixon administration took no action to implement the recommendation, however.

Arguments for and against[ edit ] For rescheduling[ edit ] Jon Gettmanformer director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Lawshas argued that cannabis does not fit each of the three statutory criteria for Schedule I.

Gettman believes that "high potential for abuse" means that a drug has a potential for abuse similar to that of heroin or cocaine.

He notes that a Institute of Medicine report found that "except for the harms associated with smokingthe adverse effects of marijuana use are within the range of effects tolerated for other medications. Inthe United States government patented cannabinoids, including those in marijuana that cause users to get "high" such as THC based on these chemicals' prevention of trauma- and age-related brain damage.


ACP urges an evidence-based review of marijuana's status as a Schedule I controlled substance to determine whether it should be reclassified to a different schedule. This review should consider the scientific findings regarding marijuana's safety and efficacy in some clinical conditions as well as evidence on the health risks associated with marijuana consumption, particularly in its crude smoked form.

The 'Mary Lou Eimer Criteria' was instrumental in the issuance of the Cole Memorandum which has set federal guidelines over states with medical marijuana laws; and has urged the federal government to reschedule marijuana to a Class IV or Class V controlled substance based on the results of the Quiggle Study.

I could have 3 micrograms in my blood even by simply inhaling too much second hand APRA wishes to see such decisions on public health reserved for physicians and laboratories with professional expertise. These criteria are not binding; they were created by DEA and may be altered at any time.

Judicial deference to agency decisions is what has kept them in effect, despite the difference between these and the statutory criteria. Cannabis is one of several plants with unproven abuse potential and toxicity that Congress placed in Schedule I.

The DEA interprets the Controlled Substances Act to mean that if a drug with even a low potential for abuse — say, equivalent to a Schedule V drug — has no accepted medical use, then it must remain in Schedule I: In such circumstances, placement of the drug in schedules II through V would conflict with the CSA since such drug would not meet the criterion of "a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.

Therefore, even if one were to assume, theoretically, that your assertions about marijuana's potential for abuse were correct i. This argument silently rejects the concept that if a drug does not meet the criteria for any schedule, it should not be in any schedule.A jar of medical marijuana is displayed at the medical marijuana farmers market at the California Heritage Market in Los Angeles, California July 11, Sen.

Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., announced Wednesday his cosponsorship of a landmark bill to end the federal prohibition on marijuana.

Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of (H.R. ) - benjaminpohle.com

Senator Cory Booker's Marijuana Justice Act would remove marijuana. HR eliminates federal criminal penalties for possessing and growing marijuana. Legalization Initiatives Federal Initiatives. Senator Cory Booker (NJ) introduced the Marijuana Justice Act in the U.S.

Senate and Representatives Barbara Lee (CA) and Ro Khanna (CA) introduced the companion bill in the U.S. House to end federal marijuana prohibition, support racial justice, and help repair communities most devastated by the war on drugs.

Sign up now for free access to this content

Canada criminalized marijuana in , one of the first countries to do so. There was no parliamentary or public debate and the government gave no explanation. And there were few pot smokers. Cultivation, production, distribution or possession of marijuana is a federal criminal offense under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).[1] Yet, despite federal prohibition, state-sanctioned.

Removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act - Wikipedia