An analysis of juror 8 in the play 12 angry men by reginald rose

At stake is the fate of a year-old boy who is on trial for the murder of his father.

Stubbornness and Taking a Stand Prejudice vs.

12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. Study Guides Q & A. Reginald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men’ is a play which displays the twelve individual jurors’ characteristics through the deliberation of a first degree murder case. Out of the twelve jurors, the 8th Juror shows an outstanding heroism exists in . An Analysis of Juror #8 in the Play 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. words. An Analysis of the Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Roses and the Capacity of Justice. words. A Focus on Juror#8 in the Play "Twelve Angry Men" words. 1 page. A Literary Analysis of Twelve Angry Men. 2, words.

Sympathies Summary Analysis The Judge gives the jury instructions from offstage, setting the scene as the lights come up. He or she lays out the stakes: He informs the jurors that they must find the defendant not guilty if there is a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.

The vote must be unanimous. The Guard opens the window, surveys the room, and moves upstage to count the jurors as they enter. However, the window, the water cooler, and the opportunity to play tic-tac-toe later distract the jurors.

Active Themes As the jurors enter, some go to the water cooler, Juror Five lights a pipe, and Juror Seven opens the window a bit wider, while still others stand and lean on their chairs.

These mundane activities establish the jurors first and foremost as human beings, capable of flaws and prejudices. Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat. Juror Nine responds to Juror Seven with a polite no. Juror Twelve complains about the heat in the room, saying that his taxes are so high they ought to cover air conditioning.

The Guard locks the door behind him as he leaves, with all the jurors settled in their seats. Twelve is self-focused and used to privilege. Seven is flighty, and only vaguely interested in the proceedings, which he hopes will end quickly.

Nine is aloof, but polite. The Guard reminds the jurors and the audience of the presence of a world and legal structure beyond the jury room. Juror Three bristles at the need for the door to be locked.

Active Themes Juror Four, acting as a peacemaker, asks everyone to openly admit that the heat in the room has them short-tempered. Juror Three, acting the contrarian, responds that he feels fine.

The Foreman suggests in response that serving on a jury is their duty, while Juror Three jokes that Juror Four should give Juror Twelve a job, noting that Juror Four is probably rich because of his custom-tailored suit.

Throughout, Four is rational and levelheaded.

On the subject of the overly hot room he urges mature behavior, while Three shows a childish inclination to disagree for the sake of disagreement. Ideas about income and the difficulties of living in poverty appear throughout the play, affecting the jury members views in general and of the case.

Active Themes The Foreman then comments that he had a friend who wanted to be on the jury instead of him. The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder.

Juror Four notes that the double jeopardy law would prevent that man from being retried for the same crime. Seven and Three reveal their certainty about the case, and it does not appear that the evidence presented or the arguments made in court were well balanced between prosecution and defense.

The switch knife, which the kid purchased and claimed to have lost, appears in the story as one of the most important pieces of evidence.

Twelve angry men - argument analysis | Bob Kavanagh - benjaminpohle.com

Yet Ten focuses not on this evidence, but on the character of impoverished people.In the play, Twelve Angry Men (also called Twelve Angry Jurors), a jury must decide whether or not to reach a guilty verdict and sentence a 19 year old defendant to benjaminpohle.com the beginning of the play, eleven jurors vote "guilty." Only one, Juror #8, believes that the young man might be innocent.

Juror Seven, Juror Four, Juror Twelve and the Foreman quickly agree, while Juror Eleven agrees more slowly. The men write down their votes and pass them to the Foreman.

The men write down their votes and pass them to the Foreman. 12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

The play is set in a New York City Court of Law jury room in The play opens to the empty jury room, and the Judge’s voice is heard, giving a set of final instructions to the.

The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty.

What is the background of Juror Number Eight in Twelve Angry Men? | eNotes	Eight" corresponds to an amiable, analytical, and intelligent man who is actually the only one who gives the accused the benefit of the doubt. He demonstrates the actual need for true justice by considering a person innocent until proved guilty.
Twelve Angry Men - Wikipedia	The search for truth, does the end justify the means?

"Twelve Angry Men" quickly became a classic story for stage and screen and Rose's cast of characters some of the most memorable in modern history.

Yet, not one of the twelve jurors has a name, they are simply known by their juror numbers. Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose “Facts and fancy” by Dr Jennifer Minter (English Works articles) At the beginning of Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men (), the judge states, “it now becomes your duty to try to separate the facts from the fancy”.